Being Smart vs. Being Creative

The other day my dad and I were talking about entrepreneurs (seriously), mainly because he is one, and he stated how he thought there were way more smart people than creative people in the world. And I agreed. But how do these adjectives (smart and creative) relate to entrepreneurship? What were we getting at?

What we were driving at is a point that has been debated for a long time. As an entrepreneur, is it better to be intensely smart or to be  intensely creative? I use the adverb “intensely” before smart and creative because in my opinion all entrepreneurs have some degree of intelligence (obviously Bill Gates is brilliant and Brian Chesky is somewhat smart despite a colossal lapse in judgment), and entrepreneurs inherently are defined by their ability to create something new or different that is simultaneously useful.  I’m also removing the option of being both intensely smart and creative because that is a lethal combination, and clearly the greatest entrepreneurs possess those two attributes in spades. But when it comes down to it, do you choose the entrepreneur whose IQ is through the roof and can solve any problem you put before him/her or do you pick the entrepreneur who’s not that bright but has a knack for coming up with ingenious ways to work around problems and can convince you they’re the right answers?

I believe you have to go with the latter for one simple reason: it is much easier to teach intelligence than to teach creativity. Aside from the fact that it is simpler to instruct someone formulas from a textbook than it is to train them how to think in general, the types of people also play a role in the ease of teaching. Intensely smart people are usually quite stubborn and think their way is the only way. However, intensely creative people are by their very nature receptive to new ideas and the possibility of learning something new. Being smart is a way of doing things, being creative is a way of engaging with things. Being smart is provincial, being creative is broad. This point was driven home to me while watching “60 Minutes” last night.

During the show, Anderson Cooper did a piece on Eminem. Even if you hate Eminem (or Anderson Cooper for that matter), I highly recommend watching it. Eminem is by all accounts not that smart – he dropped out of 9th grade in the middle of repeating it for a 3rd time in order to focus on rapping even before he knew there was a future there. But he is intensely creative and frankly obsessively compulsive. During the interview, he took out a box full of notepads, napkins, scraps of paper scrawled with ideas, lyrics, rhymes that he came up with and wanted to save for later. At the drop of a hat, he rhymed “orange” (a word that people say with which nothing rhymes) with “four-inch,” “door hinge,” and “porridge.” Only an intensely creative person could write all of those songs with lyrics that include rhyming “sweaty, heavy, already, spaghetti, ready, forgetting.” Some might say, so what, Eminem isn’t an entrepreneur. He’s just a creative guy. I’d say otherwise and encourage you to look at how Bill Simmons is an entrepreneur and how those traits of Simmons can be applied to Eminem.

At the end of day, you have to take being intensely creative over being intensely smart. A smart solution can be replicated – a truly creative one cannot.

Passion-Founder-Product-Market Fit

A lot of people have been talking about product-market fit and founder-market fit. In fact, Chris Dixon wrote a great post on founder-market fit that brought it all together.

I wanted to take this a step further. Over the last few weeks I have read some great posts and witnessed a few things here in the NYC that I think should be shared. This post is mostly inspired by the actions and words of Joe Yevoli, and Scott Britton’s excellent knowledge bomb posted earlier this week.

In addition to having founder-market fit and product market fit, I think its absolutely crucial to have passion-market fit. One could argue that founder-market fit and passion-market fit are one in the same, however, I see them as separate channels that are both just as important as the other. I believe that they both have to exist in parallel in order to truly be successful.

Assuming you have the product and market covered you are left with the founder, who has a certain set of skills along with a certain set of interests and passions. Having the right founder and team is critical and we all know this. I argue that we need to take it a step further. Passion for the product and market you are working on is just as important as the skillset you carry.  A great founder without passion for what he is doing is extremely ineffective.

As Joey wrote in his post he did not have a true passion for web video which is why he decided to work on Teamhomefield instead (no discredit to Shelby, I know the guys and love what they are doing). He was more than capable of working on Shelby and helping them kick ass, but he knew he would be even more effective by pouring his energy into a product and industry that he truly, truly loves.

My last point is your passion will influence your actions. Scott really drove home the point to screw the what if’s and go all in. You can only really do this for something you are passionate about. If that passion is missing you will always be jumping out the plane with a safety shoot. If you only have one foot in the door then you should rethink what you want to spend your time doing. Trust me, I experienced this myself for the last 3 years. If you do what you love, you will eventually find the product-market fit that works.

Burn Your Boats

I heard an amazing story at my Church this weekend. I drew many parallels from it to my own life including some of the things I’ve learned in my journey as an entrepreneur. The story goes like this:

Alexander the Great’s powerful army spent years overwhelming opposing armies in their conquests. His men were fierce and swelled with the confidence that comes with consistent victory. Yet when Alexander and his men arrived on the shores of Persia they were visibly outnumbered.  Clearly outmanned, his men pleaded that it would be wise to go back and get more men. Alexander responded by ordering the men to burn their boats. As their only means of retreat went up in flames, legend has it that Alexander turned to his men and said, “We go home in Persian ships, or we die.”

One of the key themes from this story I relate to entrepreneurship is the nature of options. The inherent ambiguity you face in an early stage company often causes you to think 2 steps ahead. What if it fails? What if people don’t like the product? Often times these lingering questions can compel us to find ways to hedge our bets…for better or worse.

What I love about this story is that Alexander the Great made one of the bravest decisions anyone can make by intentionally removing his options.  His command sent a message to his men, but more importantly it put them in a new position: one defined by focus where there is no other option but to do your absolute best…or be defeated.

I’ve come to realize startup founders often find themselves similar circumstances. You’re a small company trying to disrupt a space typically occupied by larger incumbents. The odds are stacked against you and the uncertainty of success is evident.

I’d like to believe the odds of success for founders who disengage their options are far greater than those who don’t. Its extraordinary what you’re capable of when you put yourself in a corner. The straightforwardness of succeed or die propels you to do things you’d never do. Coupled with  laser-like focus, this is a powerful combination. Compare this with someone who gets back in the boat when the going gets tough. I know who my money is on.

For the record, I understand the importance of remaining objective, failing fast, and having a backup plan. I think the best founders integrate these things with the all or nothing approach exemplified by this story.

Early on make the decision whether or not you’re going to burn your boats. If you do, successful or not, the simple fact that you gave it everything you had will bring you peace regardless of the outcome. I feel that founders who are truly passionate about solving the problem they have set out to tackle are the ones  that will always be the first to burn their boats. This will be the subject of a future post.

 

 

 

 

 

The Next Big Thing: Checking-In (Again)

I used to think there were three types of people in this world:

  1. Avid Foursquare users – those that check-in to foursquare religiously and have several mayorships, always vying for the top spot on their leaderboards;
  2. Casual Foursquare users – the check-in once in a while crowd, usually only at certain events, through other social apps that give you the option or when reminded by someone in group #1 ; and
  3. Foursquare non-users - those that have have either never heard of foursquare or think they are too cool to broadcast to the world where they are in exchange for points and digital badges.

With all of the hoopla around foursquare and its partnerships with deal sites over the last couple weeks, there’s no question check-in behavior is going to shift.. but how much?  I think the change could be significant, and here’s why.

The first thing you should know is that I very rarely use foursquare – you can throw me right in with the rest of group #2.  You might see a slew of check-ins from me once every couple of weeks at an event through @hashable, or bragging about being at the airport on my way to South Beach, but that’s really about it. 

Well something odd happened to me the other day: I found myself checking-in 2 times in one day (*GASP!*), unsolicited mind you, and using the actual foursquare app on my iPhone.  I couldn’t help but notice because there was a lot of extra effort involved in having to find the big blue checkbox icon buried deep in my app graveyard, somewhere amongst my collection of old beta tests and other seldom-used social apps (it was next to Color).  Something had tipped the scales in favor of making that effort. Actually, the scales never even existed before in the first place.  I’m just one guy and I could be wrong, but if they tipped for me, I think they just might start to tip for others as well.  

How it all changed: about two weeks ago,  I stopped by @WeWorkLabs Soho to say hello to @ScottBrit and @srcasm and see how Sfter and guyhaus were coming along (very well, if you’re wondering).  That’s when I was first introduced to Jason Fertel.  Jason (@fertel) is the founder of Freespeech, a group messaging app, but I didn’t know it at the time because he was enthusiastically explaining his new project - DealBurner (check out the story on BetaBeat here).  When I asked him what DealBurner was all about, he asked me first if I use foursquare (not a good start), and then Facebook Places (seriously?).

Just as I was about to write the whole thing off, he said something to the effect of, “you’re going to want to start”.  Ok, he had my attention… and I’m all the better for it.  If I could muster up the effort to check-in, DealBurner would send me notifications about deals going on near me, right then and there.  Google Now, LivingSocial Instant, ScoutMob, Tenka.. the list goes on.

A minute later I was signed-up, checked-in and, after a short pause (to let me bask in overtaking second-to-last place on my leaderboard, I was texted my first deal… And I was hooked.

Note: Foursquare has deals with Living Social, Gilt City, zozi, BuyWithMe, AT&T, and Groupon, but the Redemption Loop Issue still exists for all of them except for Groupon Now. In other words, you can get all of the regular deals through foursquare, but other than for Groupon Now, deals are not redeemable until after they close at the end of the day – which really makes this whole real-time, location-based thing foursquare does kind of irrelevant, no? Don’t get me wrong, foursquare is still a great distribution platform for daily deal sites, but when it comes to instant deals I would make sure I have DealBurner to get all of them sent straight to me after checking in.

So right after I get to experience DealBurner in action, something else really interesting happened.  Apparently my check-in had also sparked an alert from another promising NYC startup - Sonar had just notified me that I might want to reach out to someone else checked-in at WeWork because we have a mutual friend on facebook – someone named Jason F.

Touché foursquare, touché…  So now, I think there’s four types of people in this world and you can add me to a new group somewhere in between my original #1 and #2.  You still won’t see me feverishly competing for mayorships or the top spot on any of the leaderboards. Nonetheless, there’s definitely enough cool stuff now built on top of the foursquare API to bring me real value – and that means more check-ins… and a new spot for the app on my iPhone home screen.

Actually I should say, bravo foursquare.  It’s amazing that they’ve been able to capture such a large user base with so little in tangible incentives.  Now that foursquare and the applications that are leveraging their platform are finding ways to deliver real value in the form of financial savings and  serendipitous connections, it puts them in position to make some significant leaps. It also means they might be coming to a crossroads.

At the end of the day, for foursquare to truly obtain massive adoption, they need to ensure these types of “real world” value propositions become heavily coupled with the use of their application.   The big question is going to be: do they expand into these adjacent markets  and start providing these services in-house so they can extract more value?  Or, do they stay the course and continue building the platform to enable more of these services at the expense of diluting that value for something more down the road?  Or maybe they can walk the fine line somewhere in between?  I don’t know what the right answer is, and it’s probably a whole series of posts for another time, but it will definitely be interesting to see how this all plays out.

Defining an Entrepreneur

Some believe that a person is simply born an entrepreneur, that entrepreneurship can’t be taught in the classroom or through seminars and conferences. Others believe that you can mold and shape someone into becoming an entrepreneur over time. I tend to align with the former group. Yes, you can certainly teach someone the necessary skills that an entrepreneur needs to possess. However, people that are entrepreneurs are just hardwired differently than everyone else. They are willing to throw caution to the wind when necessary but also can take measured risks. They find solutions to problems that were previously thought unsolvable. This inherent hardwiring is certainly not a guarantee for success; just as not being an entrepreneur doesn’t mean you will fail. It is merely a dichotomy in the way people think about the world and the problems that are in it. But if we take this as a given, that some people think like entrepreneurs and others don’t, how do we define those that do? Does an entrepreneur have to start his / her own company? Does an entrepreneur have to create something entirely new? What really is the (non-Oxford English Dictionary) definition of an entrepreneur?

In a post yesterday, on the Harvard Business Review blog, Grant McCracken asks the question, “Who and what is an entrepreneur?” He poses this question after hearing Marc Ventresca, a professor from Oxford’s Said Business School, say that entrepreneurs create endeavors by  ”marshaling, mobilizing, and connecting different worlds.” In essence, Ventresca believes that nothing that is invented or started is new – it is merely a derivative of something or combination of things that came before it. McCracken, on the other hand, subscribes to the “heroic” definition of an entrepreneur, such that a person creates something altogether new and goes outside the “capsule of culture.” While he acknowledges that some entrepreneurs “repurpose what exists,” that type of definition doesn’t aptly describe those entrepreneurs who suffer the “penalty of taking the lead.” At the end of the day, though, defining an entrepreneur is a virtually impossible and, frankly, fruitless task. An entrepreneur (and by extension, entrepreneurship and the entrepreneurial spirit) is not tangible. Sure, a person can be an entrepreneur, but the effort, the hardwiring, the belief system, etc. that goes into a person doing something entrepreneurial can’t be put in a box. For me, trying to define an entrepreneur is a little like what Justice Potter Stewart encountered when trying to define pornography: I know it when I see it.

Enhanced by Zemanta

How to Break in and Build A Network in the Startup Scene from Scratch

This is an old post from my personal blog I’m republishing here due to the frequency I’ve been encountering people trying to break into the startup world.

“I want to break into the startup scene…but I can’t code”

If I had a nickle for every time I’ve heard that…I’d probably have like $3.20. But seriously, I don’t know if its because the tech scene is hot right now or that the composition of my personal network is changing, but it seems like a lot of people I talk to who aren’t already in the startup scene want to break in to it. I feel that the common misconception many people have is that they have to be a developer or designer to do this. Although these qualifications help, its a far cry from a necessity.

This post serves as a personal case study of my journey to what I call really breaking in. If your looking to be just “a guy who works at a startup” that’s fine.  But if you want to build a solid network of people that you can call on, connect, and add value to you’ve come to the right place. In my opinion, having this type of network makes becoming a successful entrepreneur infinitely easier.

Step 1: Find someone you know and dropkick the door down.

If you have no technical experience or your Uncle isn’t Ron Conway look for people you know that are currently working in startups and see how you can get involved. I broke in by cold calling a guy I had class with 4 years earlier in college. Let me preface this by saying we weren’t really friends as undergraduates. I just saw a NYT article on his site, found his number on the press kit and called him in the parking lot during my lunch break to tell him how excited I was about what he was doing. A conversation or two later, I offered to work for free and eventually got the nod prompting me to quit my job the next day. Moving from a lofty two bedroom apartment in Chicago to back home with Mom and Dad wasn’t easy. Especially when you’re making no money (they covered my travel/lunch) and commuting over an hour by train. But if you really want to immerse yourself into this world full force, you can’t expect to be handed an opportunity. Once you have a window and a chance to get your foot in the door you need to do whatever it takes to seize the opportunity.

Step 2: Once there, drink out of a firehouse 

Ok you’re now a guy who semi-”works at a startup”. I could write a whole post on just this stage of the game, but I’ll stick to the general themes for the sake of time and what sounds like a good episode of Tosh.O.

At work: Try to get involved in as many different facets off the business as you can so that you can learn as much as possible. Ask a ton of questions about not only what is going on right now, but also the past and future to learn about how they got from point A to point B.

During your commute: Listen to podcasts/audio books about entrepreneurship, startups, VC. I really enjoy Entrepreneurial Thought Leaders and VentureVoice.

Step 3: Socialize and get used to buying other people  coffee and lunch.

Right from the get go its really important to start getting to know other people in the scene. Start out with people in your office, even co-workers if you’re shy.  A great way to do this is to offer to take them out for a coffee or lunch during your free time so you can hear a bit more about their experience working in the startup world. Once you’ve exhausted your co-working space just cold email people in your region who are doing cool things saying you’d love to buy them lunch to hear more about their project. I’m copying a cold facebook message below I used that worked many times:

“Hey RICKY BOBBY,

I just came across BESTSTARTUPEVER.COM on techcrunch and thought it was totally awesome. I’m working over at LESSAWESOME.COM down the street and would love to take you out for lunch or a coffee sometime to hear a bit more about what you guys are doing to see if I can help out in any way. I’m kind of new to this whole startup thing and would really appreciate any insight on your experience thus far. If you’re too busy, no worries just means I get to use the product sooner! Take care”

You have nothing to lose and startup guys rarely say no to a free meal…trust me. I was able to learn so much from these early interactions which is just one of many reasons why they’re so important.

Step 4: Look to provide value and seek nothing in return

 This philosophy should be the focal point of all of your interactions not only at this point of your journey, but throughout your entire life (in my opinion). When your talking with these people learn about their challenges and see if there is any way you can help. Common ways include feedback, pinging relevant articles, and connecting them with people who can help/their business has synergy with.

Connecting people is huge and something that comes naturally once you have met enough people. Think about who from your growing network could help someone out and then make an introduction (if they give you the okay). This goes a long way and helps you establish yourself as a connector.

STEP 5: Start getting people together by hosting events

Okay so at this point, you’ve got a pretty solid group of people in your corner. Now its time to ramp it up by getting together people who don’t know each other together in a group setting which can be really fun. Again, I like to focus these events on providing value for others. I have three events I host at different frequencies with a partner(s).

Startup breakfast: Once every 2 weeks I used to get 6 new people together early in the morning to discuss their challenges and get feedback from each other on how they can overcome them. INCREDIBLE

Poor Man’s Dinner: Either every other Thursday/Weds night myself and a friend get 8 new people together to shoot the breeze over some cheap eats. Really fun.

These steps have helped me to grow a pretty decent network in the NY startup scene. Also, don’t think you have to have some incredible skin on your wall like starting a successful company to validate putting events on. Remember you’re just facilitating the interaction of others, not lecturing on your accomplishments or what you know.

I also recommend going to multiple meetups and events each week and developing an active online presence (blogs/twitter with a splash of facebook). There’s a ton of other ways to grow your network, like build foursquare, but this is just how I did it. Now go out there and get it done!

The Best Part About NYC’s Tech Scene

Last week, my fellow Venturebent writer Nick Gavronsky wrote about how critical it is for startups to create their own unique culture and the various ways the initial leadership team can do so.  Part of what goes into the cultivation of this culture is the intrinsic ethos that entrepreneurs and management teams themselves bring to the table.  Oftentimes, the primary component of this ethos is dogged determination, the notion that even if no one believes in your idea, you and your team do — and that is all that matters on Day 1.

Over the last several months, as I’ve gotten to know numerous young entrepreneurs in NYC, I have found this stubborn persistence in every person I’ve met. This attitude was perfectly encapsulated in a recent post by Reece Pacheco, one of the entrepreneurs I’ve gotten to know. After raising a round of funding for Shelby.tv, Reece reiterates the importance of a key mantra: expect nothing, earn everything. This attitude is one I’ve adopted during my efforts to break into NYC’s tech scene, and I’ve also seen it in all the guys on our Venturebent roster as well as others entrenched in the NYC tech scene whether they’ve taken the plunge of starting a company or not.

Alex Taub recently tweeted that he has a circle on Google+ called “Young and Hungry Tech,” a phrase which epitomizes Venturebent’s mission as well as the best part about the NYC tech community. As this tech wave continues, I have no doubt that NYC’s startup scene and the guys I write with on Venturebent won’t get full on current successes, but rather will look to feast on future endeavors.

What I learned today: Startup culture

There are several factors that lead to a company’s success: funding, talent, and product/market fit, however, one of the most overlooked elements is a company’s culture and the expectations that come with it. Culture is crucial.

Next to product/market fit, I believe culture is the second most important element for success, but it is often overshadowed by talent. Many companies look for the best talent and then like pieces of a puzzle piece the team together hoping that the culture will magically develop itself over time. That is a dangerous approach. I wish more companies took the opposite approach. While talent is crucial, especially in today’s competitive environment, a strong culture from day one will establish the foundation to attract the best talent.

So what is the right kind of culture? I have thought about this quite a lot and I believe that the following cultural  foundations are important to establish from the get go:

  1. Vision: This is crucial in the early stages. Your vision should be built to excite and inspire. You need to make it a priority that all of your employees coherently understand your vision and are working toward it every single day and in everything that they do. They also need to understand how the vision fits in with your culture. As a CEO or manager one of the first things you should be doing is explaining and communicating the vision to your teams so that your employees understand what it is going to take to hit the nail on the head. This way they are much less likely to waste time and resources on things that won’t get you to the summit. Aaron from Box.net explains this brilliantly here. You need to stick to your long-term vision and don’t change it to make a quick buck. It’s even worse when your employees see you flip flopping.
  2. Meritocracy: This is such a buzz word because so many companies claim they have a culture where the best performance is always recognized, especially much larger, less inefficient ones–aka corporate America. In order to make this work you need to truly reward those that go above and beyond, understand your vision, and help the company grow in everything that they do. Your best developer should be head of development, your best sales person should be heading sales, etc. Leadership should flow both top down and bottom up. Rather than hiring someone with experience externally to head these areas, I think its best to promote within–promote someone who has been there and built the business from the ground up.
  3. Survival of fittest: I am a big believer in developing a healthy competition in the workplace. You need to motivate your employees to strive to be the best and establish a culture where only the strongest will survive. Things move fast and there is no room for dead weight, especially at a startup. I am not saying establish an environment where everyone is constantly watching their backs, but you need to set the precedent that performance will be rewarded and that you will part ways with those that just aren’t getting it. There is a fine balance here. Obviously you need to let your employees fail along the way but if they are not learning from these failures it is time for them to go.
  4. Fight constraints: Be willing to run into those brick walls in your way. It’s inspiring for employees to see their CEO or manager do what it takes and find a way to make it happen. It may be exhausting to fight these constraints, but you need to create a culture that is willing to tackle adversity and come up with unique solutions to problems that at first seem insurmountable. Encourage your teams to try and come up with these solutions and always communicate and share their strategies.

If you can succeed in building the right culture and an environment where the best people are rewarded and recognized then finding that product/market fit, recruiting the best talent, and raising money will become that much easier.

I would love to hear everyones thoughts on what other factors you think are important as well as what to take into consideration when building the right kind of culture.

Where Can You Win

Over 4th of July weekend I had a great talk with a friend’s Dad whose had a pretty stellar career in private equity. He probably still has American Online and couldn’t tell you what a hashtag is, but the guy is a total sage when it comes to business insight across the board.

We talked about how important it is to find a career that truly excites you: nothing new there. A more thought provoking conversation surrounded how we must objectively evaluate our personal strengths and weaknesses to see where we can win professionally. Its an incredible insight that I think is particularly important for entrepreneurs to think about.

If I was a betting man, or a VC : ), I’d always put my money on entrepreneurs who I think have a competitive advantage. I think an advantage can manifest itself in a few ways: talent, insight, relationships, and you might be able to throw timing in there. If you don’t feel like you have one of these going for you take a look in the mirror and ask yourself how you can win. If your answer is a unique idea my chips are on the other guy.  Let’s break these down:

Talent: Be objective about the talent you have and your chances of winning given those circumstances. Odds are if your team’s technical abilities are limited you shouldn’t try to build the most advanced search algorithm known to man. Unless of course you can hire the person who can do this. Stick to your guns and play ball at a level you can legitimately compete at. You’ll give yourself a better chance of succeeding. I say this not to discourage innovation, but to encourage success. If the sky’s the limit than rock on and let me know what you’re building.

Insight: The term “unique domain insight” is coveted for a reason – entrepreneurs who build businesses around spaces they deeply understand are more likely to win. They can see opportunities others can’t just as easily as they can anticipate potential hurdles and understand how to overcome them – so important. If you have no idea about the space you’re competing in hire or talk at length with someone that does.

Relationships: Sadly its not always the best products that win; sometimes its those who have forged the best strategic relationships. If you have them, good for you – this can make up for other shortcomings. If you don’t, evaluate the playing field and understand who does and what that means for your business. Do you want exclusive access to the twitter firehose for a groundbreaking data service. Better make sure somebody whose doing the same thing hasn’t beaten you to the punch.

Timing: This one is tough to argue because technically anyone interested in building a business has the same timing as you. I think this more speaks to first mover advantage (which isn’t always good) or unique insight into a confluence of factors. Both of these are a bit redundant. First mover advantage ultimately manifests itself as relationships with users, consumers, and partners. Insight on timing is, well, insight.

Ultimately, the thesis of this post requires entrepreneurs to ask themselves one question: are they poised to build the business they’rebuilding? I’m not asking are they the most poised because there will always be people out there who are better suited to do something. I’m asking at some level do you possess something that will enable you to win? Those who can answer yes have a far better chance of succeeding. If you can’t answer yes think about the collective superpowers of your team and where you can win – if you find something there that excites you the sky’s the limit.

Master and Commander

Scott wrote a fantastic post earlier today about always finishing.  It really got me thinking about what makes me most productive and I think he’s absolutely right. As I was writing a comment to his post, it got kind of long so I though I might as well just post a short follow-up.

Ultimately, I believe everyone has their own personal strategies and tactics for how to be most productive.  The thing I’ve found is no matter what these things are for anyone individually, three main points underlie what it means to “always finish” and you will find them in all successful entrepreneurs (including Scott): discipline, focus and consistency.

I believe that whether it’s exercise, diet, sleep, to-do lists, careful organization, meditation or any number of things that you find help you do more faster personally, the most important thing – what’s at the core of it all – is that you stick to whatever works for you and have the discipline to stick with it 100% despite everything else pulling you in a million directions at any given time.  By doing so, you achieve ultimate command of yourself through consistently reinforcing the habit of following through, executing and being at your best.

So how do you master this illusive and fleeting state of always bringing your ‘A’ game?  Primarily, I think that it’s embedded in us from a young age by our parents and role models (being surrounded by people with a strong work ethic throughout my life no doubt had a huge impact on me).  However, if you’re looking for something you can control right now – when you feel yourself slipping, start small and build up some momentum sticking to and finishing whatever it is that makes you personally productive.  If I can’t set my mind to something, I just start doing it and that almost always has the effect of setting my mind to it for me.

Want the ultimate fix?  Sure – it all comes back to those same old clichés: Have a passion for what you do and a chip on your shoulder – something to prove, whether to yourself or someone else.  Unfortunately, I can’t help you be passionate about something you’re not.  However, if I really want to be productive and make sure I ‘always finish’, I found that the following never fails: I tell 10 of my closest friends and family members that I’m going to do something and ask them to hold me to it.  If I need even more of a spark, I would offer to pay them each $100 if I don’t follow through.  You will finish – I promise.

If all else fails, there’s always coffee.