Tag Archives: Entrepreneurship

9 Lessons You Need to Succeed in a Crowded Market

Stand Up to the Elephant | Sparkology

When I first pitched the idea for Sparkology as an exclusive dating service, the biggest objection was also the most obvious: are you really going to create another dating site?  After all, there are thousands of dating service companies operating in the US and a handful of conglomerates have dominated the space for over a decade.  Match.com (owns OKCupid), Spark Networks (owns JDate and other properties), eHarmony, PlentyOfFish, Zoosk, True.com… all major companies with big marketing spend and millions of claimed users.  How did I expect to stack up and create a profitable business?

Six months later we have a solid team that’s generating real revenue on top of a successful platform.  Our client base is growing according to plan and, most importantly, those who use our service have become loyal brand evangelists.  Here are some of the strategies we have learned to use:

Choose the Right Niche

This is the only “no-brainer” of the pointers but I would be remiss if I excluded it.  You want to choose a niche demographic that the 800lb Gorillas won’t want to touch.  For us, it was selecting a demographic that is too small for a volume-based company to focus on.  We also selected a population that has high expectations for quality and customer service.  Lastly, we chose a demographic that is highly educated and is thus less effected by mass-media marketing approaches typically used by major brands.

However, you should also select a demographic that does not have a low ceiling for growth.  For example, one could create a dating website called jewishlithuanianswholovecats.com but that has a very real and very defined cap on the target demographic.  Instead, our mission of creating a quality-driven and efficient dating experience for young professional singles in large cities offers room for expansion of the potential market in step with the expansion of the company.  A company like IvyDate.com, for example, may experience brand dilution as it has run out of Ivy grads and is no longer true to its name.

Find Their Weakness

If you are innovating in a crowded market, you need to determine and exploit the key common weakness shared by your behemoth foes to make your marketing message efficient.  When Chipotle entered the crowded Tex-Mex food market, they exploited the common belief that a typical fast-food Tex-Mex establishment was grimy.  When we entered the dating market, we found that the majority of users in our demographic viewed dating sites as untrustworthy and only for runts who couldn’t get a date in real life.  If you can focus on the common weakness, you are able to cast a shadow on all of your competitors with one fell marketing line.

Take a Bold Stance

By being small, you have the ability to make bold, controversial statements.  If a few years ago the guys from 37Signals said “Salesforce sucks” only their fanboys would take note.  If Salesforce.com did the opposite, the negative public fallout would be a PR nightmare, not to mention all the positive publicity that statement would generate for 37Signals’ Highrise product.  Your goal as a small company is to develop a core group of Innovators and Early Adopters that are loyal to your dogma and help spread your gospel.  However, you need to provide your early clients with a powerful gospel to spread.  A guy won’t tell his friend that there’s a “new dating site” but he might tell his friends he’s on a site that lets him “stand out from the losers on OKC”.

Jujitsu

Assuming you are trying to shake up an industry, you can use the widespread negative sentiment against the current state of the industry by becoming the anti-status quo.  We’ve seen “voting for change” win over a national electorate base and it works the same way with customers.  Whether you are the anti-McDonalds, anti-800Flowers.com, or anti-Match.com you can use negative sentiment built by large brands over decades to your advantage.  You are changing the industry for the better, and you should motivate all those who believe in a better industry to take your side.

Geography

Unless you managed to get a Series C valuation on an Angel round, you simply do not have the capital and manpower to compete on a national or even regional scale.  Pick the smallest geography that will get you to profitability in light of your fixed costs and become master of that domain.  You will not be able to compete against the marketing machine of a large competitor in all markets, but perhaps your marketing power can match the large competitor in a small geography.  After you succeed in one place, you can easily ride the enthusiasm and positive press into other areas.

* The obvious risk is that a competitor launches your exact same product/service in parallel in another area.  Your goal should be to reach cash flow positive in the first geography in half the time it took you to develop the company from start to launch.

 

Get Personal

Embrace the fact that you are a small passionate team.  It’s much easier for customers to support the efforts of 5 struggling entrepreneurs than 500 corporate cogs.  Make yourself accessible to customers and share your personal story.  What made you start this company?  What keeps you going?  What do you struggle with?  Post pictures of your team doing something silly.  Send personal gifts to clients.  Get your hands dirty in the customer service inbox.  Every person on your small team may be a C-level executive… but the customer will still relish a personal response signed by the CEO rather than the intern you hired last week

As a startup, you should be maximizing the personal connection with customers.  While live events don’t always have high ROIs in terms of customer acquisition, the rapport you can build with attendees is immeasurable.  I can write all over our website that I believe in the modern gentleman and lady… but that belief becomes much more authentic when members see the passion with which I embrace that mantra.  Perhaps you can host intimate dinner parties for select customers?  Perhaps you can create an invite-only Facebook group for the key influencers?  You need to use the low barriers between you and your customers to your advantage.

The Big Guys Are Smart – Learn from Them

Chances are, the incumbent players in your space have been around for a while.  They have optimized their platforms for user acquisition, user experience, and user retention.  This is not the time to put your head in the sand.  Why not take a lesson from the pros?  Become a customer of every competitor. Learn what they do and why they do it.  I’m not saying you should replicate an entire business model, but at the very least you should understand their rationale for doing X before you do Y.  We hypothesize that OKCupid intentionally makes dating into a game to keep users clicking around their website so they can serve as many ads as possible.  When we designed a results-driven user experience, we needed to understand this would diminish the time a customer spends on our site so ad-based revenue would be irrelevant.

Competitive tracking also helps Search Engine Optimization.  There are a myriad of tools that will expose how a competitor obtains a certain page rank and where they source their backlinks.  With this information, you can at the very least employ a strategy to match their SEO status if not beat it.

Ninja Speed

Perhaps the most important element you possess is the speed with which you can adapt your service.  How long do you think it takes for your 800lb Gorilla to roll out a new feature?  Even after spending months gathering customer data, defining project objectives, assembling a dedicated team, and all the other corporate muck, they would need to test it exhaustively to make sure it doesn’t interfere with any of the other thousands of features that were added over the last decade; they would need to ensure compatibility across all their platforms, some of which are likely leftover from past acquisitions; they would need to test the update to ensure it propagates properly across dozens of servers; etc. etc. etc.

How about you?

My hope is that you can go from a customer suggestion to a team decision to test environment in 48 hours and get it into the customer’s hands within 3 days.  You get instant feedback on the feature’s performance and the customers see continual evolution of the product as well as a barrage of positive product updates to keep enthusiasm high.  Make sure to notify the customer who suggested the change after the feature has been implemented. What better way to create loyal customers than letting them take ownership of the product itself?

Divide into two teams of developers.  A core, focused team that works on major releases and a smaller scrum team that handles the hellish firedrills.

The Bigger They Are…

Entering a crowded market is a daunting task.  However, you are also entering a market where the customer is already “trained” to purchase a product or service type so the risk of building primary demand is gone.  By using your small size to your advantage, you can utilize the negativity associated with large competitors to create a core group of devout customers who recognize your value proposition, promote your product, and drive you toward positive cash flow so you can successfully take on the 800lb Gorillas.

Now get out there and disrupt a market!

Being Smart vs. Being Creative

The other day my dad and I were talking about entrepreneurs (seriously), mainly because he is one, and he stated how he thought there were way more smart people than creative people in the world. And I agreed. But how do these adjectives (smart and creative) relate to entrepreneurship? What were we getting at?

What we were driving at is a point that has been debated for a long time. As an entrepreneur, is it better to be intensely smart or to be  intensely creative? I use the adverb “intensely” before smart and creative because in my opinion all entrepreneurs have some degree of intelligence (obviously Bill Gates is brilliant and Brian Chesky is somewhat smart despite a colossal lapse in judgment), and entrepreneurs inherently are defined by their ability to create something new or different that is simultaneously useful.  I’m also removing the option of being both intensely smart and creative because that is a lethal combination, and clearly the greatest entrepreneurs possess those two attributes in spades. But when it comes down to it, do you choose the entrepreneur whose IQ is through the roof and can solve any problem you put before him/her or do you pick the entrepreneur who’s not that bright but has a knack for coming up with ingenious ways to work around problems and can convince you they’re the right answers?

I believe you have to go with the latter for one simple reason: it is much easier to teach intelligence than to teach creativity. Aside from the fact that it is simpler to instruct someone formulas from a textbook than it is to train them how to think in general, the types of people also play a role in the ease of teaching. Intensely smart people are usually quite stubborn and think their way is the only way. However, intensely creative people are by their very nature receptive to new ideas and the possibility of learning something new. Being smart is a way of doing things, being creative is a way of engaging with things. Being smart is provincial, being creative is broad. This point was driven home to me while watching “60 Minutes” last night.

During the show, Anderson Cooper did a piece on Eminem. Even if you hate Eminem (or Anderson Cooper for that matter), I highly recommend watching it. Eminem is by all accounts not that smart – he dropped out of 9th grade in the middle of repeating it for a 3rd time in order to focus on rapping even before he knew there was a future there. But he is intensely creative and frankly obsessively compulsive. During the interview, he took out a box full of notepads, napkins, scraps of paper scrawled with ideas, lyrics, rhymes that he came up with and wanted to save for later. At the drop of a hat, he rhymed “orange” (a word that people say with which nothing rhymes) with “four-inch,” “door hinge,” and “porridge.” Only an intensely creative person could write all of those songs with lyrics that include rhyming “sweaty, heavy, already, spaghetti, ready, forgetting.” Some might say, so what, Eminem isn’t an entrepreneur. He’s just a creative guy. I’d say otherwise and encourage you to look at how Bill Simmons is an entrepreneur and how those traits of Simmons can be applied to Eminem.

At the end of day, you have to take being intensely creative over being intensely smart. A smart solution can be replicated – a truly creative one cannot.

Defining an Entrepreneur

Some believe that a person is simply born an entrepreneur, that entrepreneurship can’t be taught in the classroom or through seminars and conferences. Others believe that you can mold and shape someone into becoming an entrepreneur over time. I tend to align with the former group. Yes, you can certainly teach someone the necessary skills that an entrepreneur needs to possess. However, people that are entrepreneurs are just hardwired differently than everyone else. They are willing to throw caution to the wind when necessary but also can take measured risks. They find solutions to problems that were previously thought unsolvable. This inherent hardwiring is certainly not a guarantee for success; just as not being an entrepreneur doesn’t mean you will fail. It is merely a dichotomy in the way people think about the world and the problems that are in it. But if we take this as a given, that some people think like entrepreneurs and others don’t, how do we define those that do? Does an entrepreneur have to start his / her own company? Does an entrepreneur have to create something entirely new? What really is the (non-Oxford English Dictionary) definition of an entrepreneur?

In a post yesterday, on the Harvard Business Review blog, Grant McCracken asks the question, “Who and what is an entrepreneur?” He poses this question after hearing Marc Ventresca, a professor from Oxford’s Said Business School, say that entrepreneurs create endeavors by  ”marshaling, mobilizing, and connecting different worlds.” In essence, Ventresca believes that nothing that is invented or started is new – it is merely a derivative of something or combination of things that came before it. McCracken, on the other hand, subscribes to the “heroic” definition of an entrepreneur, such that a person creates something altogether new and goes outside the “capsule of culture.” While he acknowledges that some entrepreneurs “repurpose what exists,” that type of definition doesn’t aptly describe those entrepreneurs who suffer the “penalty of taking the lead.” At the end of the day, though, defining an entrepreneur is a virtually impossible and, frankly, fruitless task. An entrepreneur (and by extension, entrepreneurship and the entrepreneurial spirit) is not tangible. Sure, a person can be an entrepreneur, but the effort, the hardwiring, the belief system, etc. that goes into a person doing something entrepreneurial can’t be put in a box. For me, trying to define an entrepreneur is a little like what Justice Potter Stewart encountered when trying to define pornography: I know it when I see it.

Enhanced by Zemanta