Tag Archives: NYC Tech

9 Lessons You Need to Succeed in a Crowded Market

Stand Up to the Elephant | Sparkology

When I first pitched the idea for Sparkology as an exclusive dating service, the biggest objection was also the most obvious: are you really going to create another dating site?  After all, there are thousands of dating service companies operating in the US and a handful of conglomerates have dominated the space for over a decade.  Match.com (owns OKCupid), Spark Networks (owns JDate and other properties), eHarmony, PlentyOfFish, Zoosk, True.com… all major companies with big marketing spend and millions of claimed users.  How did I expect to stack up and create a profitable business?

Six months later we have a solid team that’s generating real revenue on top of a successful platform.  Our client base is growing according to plan and, most importantly, those who use our service have become loyal brand evangelists.  Here are some of the strategies we have learned to use:

Choose the Right Niche

This is the only “no-brainer” of the pointers but I would be remiss if I excluded it.  You want to choose a niche demographic that the 800lb Gorillas won’t want to touch.  For us, it was selecting a demographic that is too small for a volume-based company to focus on.  We also selected a population that has high expectations for quality and customer service.  Lastly, we chose a demographic that is highly educated and is thus less effected by mass-media marketing approaches typically used by major brands.

However, you should also select a demographic that does not have a low ceiling for growth.  For example, one could create a dating website called jewishlithuanianswholovecats.com but that has a very real and very defined cap on the target demographic.  Instead, our mission of creating a quality-driven and efficient dating experience for young professional singles in large cities offers room for expansion of the potential market in step with the expansion of the company.  A company like IvyDate.com, for example, may experience brand dilution as it has run out of Ivy grads and is no longer true to its name.

Find Their Weakness

If you are innovating in a crowded market, you need to determine and exploit the key common weakness shared by your behemoth foes to make your marketing message efficient.  When Chipotle entered the crowded Tex-Mex food market, they exploited the common belief that a typical fast-food Tex-Mex establishment was grimy.  When we entered the dating market, we found that the majority of users in our demographic viewed dating sites as untrustworthy and only for runts who couldn’t get a date in real life.  If you can focus on the common weakness, you are able to cast a shadow on all of your competitors with one fell marketing line.

Take a Bold Stance

By being small, you have the ability to make bold, controversial statements.  If a few years ago the guys from 37Signals said “Salesforce sucks” only their fanboys would take note.  If Salesforce.com did the opposite, the negative public fallout would be a PR nightmare, not to mention all the positive publicity that statement would generate for 37Signals’ Highrise product.  Your goal as a small company is to develop a core group of Innovators and Early Adopters that are loyal to your dogma and help spread your gospel.  However, you need to provide your early clients with a powerful gospel to spread.  A guy won’t tell his friend that there’s a “new dating site” but he might tell his friends he’s on a site that lets him “stand out from the losers on OKC”.

Jujitsu

Assuming you are trying to shake up an industry, you can use the widespread negative sentiment against the current state of the industry by becoming the anti-status quo.  We’ve seen “voting for change” win over a national electorate base and it works the same way with customers.  Whether you are the anti-McDonalds, anti-800Flowers.com, or anti-Match.com you can use negative sentiment built by large brands over decades to your advantage.  You are changing the industry for the better, and you should motivate all those who believe in a better industry to take your side.

Geography

Unless you managed to get a Series C valuation on an Angel round, you simply do not have the capital and manpower to compete on a national or even regional scale.  Pick the smallest geography that will get you to profitability in light of your fixed costs and become master of that domain.  You will not be able to compete against the marketing machine of a large competitor in all markets, but perhaps your marketing power can match the large competitor in a small geography.  After you succeed in one place, you can easily ride the enthusiasm and positive press into other areas.

* The obvious risk is that a competitor launches your exact same product/service in parallel in another area.  Your goal should be to reach cash flow positive in the first geography in half the time it took you to develop the company from start to launch.

 

Get Personal

Embrace the fact that you are a small passionate team.  It’s much easier for customers to support the efforts of 5 struggling entrepreneurs than 500 corporate cogs.  Make yourself accessible to customers and share your personal story.  What made you start this company?  What keeps you going?  What do you struggle with?  Post pictures of your team doing something silly.  Send personal gifts to clients.  Get your hands dirty in the customer service inbox.  Every person on your small team may be a C-level executive… but the customer will still relish a personal response signed by the CEO rather than the intern you hired last week

As a startup, you should be maximizing the personal connection with customers.  While live events don’t always have high ROIs in terms of customer acquisition, the rapport you can build with attendees is immeasurable.  I can write all over our website that I believe in the modern gentleman and lady… but that belief becomes much more authentic when members see the passion with which I embrace that mantra.  Perhaps you can host intimate dinner parties for select customers?  Perhaps you can create an invite-only Facebook group for the key influencers?  You need to use the low barriers between you and your customers to your advantage.

The Big Guys Are Smart – Learn from Them

Chances are, the incumbent players in your space have been around for a while.  They have optimized their platforms for user acquisition, user experience, and user retention.  This is not the time to put your head in the sand.  Why not take a lesson from the pros?  Become a customer of every competitor. Learn what they do and why they do it.  I’m not saying you should replicate an entire business model, but at the very least you should understand their rationale for doing X before you do Y.  We hypothesize that OKCupid intentionally makes dating into a game to keep users clicking around their website so they can serve as many ads as possible.  When we designed a results-driven user experience, we needed to understand this would diminish the time a customer spends on our site so ad-based revenue would be irrelevant.

Competitive tracking also helps Search Engine Optimization.  There are a myriad of tools that will expose how a competitor obtains a certain page rank and where they source their backlinks.  With this information, you can at the very least employ a strategy to match their SEO status if not beat it.

Ninja Speed

Perhaps the most important element you possess is the speed with which you can adapt your service.  How long do you think it takes for your 800lb Gorilla to roll out a new feature?  Even after spending months gathering customer data, defining project objectives, assembling a dedicated team, and all the other corporate muck, they would need to test it exhaustively to make sure it doesn’t interfere with any of the other thousands of features that were added over the last decade; they would need to ensure compatibility across all their platforms, some of which are likely leftover from past acquisitions; they would need to test the update to ensure it propagates properly across dozens of servers; etc. etc. etc.

How about you?

My hope is that you can go from a customer suggestion to a team decision to test environment in 48 hours and get it into the customer’s hands within 3 days.  You get instant feedback on the feature’s performance and the customers see continual evolution of the product as well as a barrage of positive product updates to keep enthusiasm high.  Make sure to notify the customer who suggested the change after the feature has been implemented. What better way to create loyal customers than letting them take ownership of the product itself?

Divide into two teams of developers.  A core, focused team that works on major releases and a smaller scrum team that handles the hellish firedrills.

The Bigger They Are…

Entering a crowded market is a daunting task.  However, you are also entering a market where the customer is already “trained” to purchase a product or service type so the risk of building primary demand is gone.  By using your small size to your advantage, you can utilize the negativity associated with large competitors to create a core group of devout customers who recognize your value proposition, promote your product, and drive you toward positive cash flow so you can successfully take on the 800lb Gorillas.

Now get out there and disrupt a market!

Learning from Experience: Technology, Content, and Users

When I first dabbled in coding years ago, I got delusional. I think it happens to a lot of people… Looking at many of the companies that are getting funding today, it’s easy to think “I could build that, and if I do people will flock to it, which equals a successful business!”

It’s easy to think that a web application, with the right features and API connections, equals a business. But, from experience and making lots of mistakes, I’ve realized how important it is to balance technology, content, and users, instead of planning and building just the technology (or product) assuming the other two will follow.

I’ll use DeviceKnit as an example. It was started in early 2010 as a user-generated content site where people share the ways they’re using their own electronics together to help others find ways to get the most from devices they own.

We set out with an audience in mind, but instead of talking to potential users as much as we could have and developing the content, we spent way too much time building the site itself, and then, only after months of development, started getting it in users’ hands and getting feedback, and finally started creating content.

It was very easy to get locked into thinking about cool features we could build, but at the time we didn’t realize that’s completely useless if no one has told us it’s what he or she wants.

Working this way lets you come up with a grand idea that’s far from a business. Warning signs: you pitch as “we’re going to build a platform for _” or “we’re going to build _, and then the same thing in many different verticals!” or your pitch sounds more like a list of features.

DeviceKnit got into an incubator too early. We should have had a Minimum Viable Product (MVP) generating revenue before even thinking of applying to any kind of accelerator program. Here’s a quick overview of DeviceKnit from late 2009 to today:

  1. Had basic idea
  2. Had more ideas to make it into a huge business
  3. Got carried away looking at it from a high level
  4. Designed a few wireframes (almost technology/product, but not really)
  5. Realized how bloated the idea was
  6. Removed the ridiculous parts that wouldn’t be included for years
  7. Got into an incubator (and got money) to work full time on it
  8. Contracted an AWESOME designer (in hind site, the best investment we made, but it was too early… this is the first bit of the “technology” part)
  9. Started building prototype (Finally! some “technology”)
  10. Spent months trying to build our first version and integrate it with our designs with wayyy to many features and without talking to people about it (technology)
  11. Launched with a little content and no committed users (lack of content and users)
  12. Raised a little more money from angel investors so we could pay ourselves to keep working on it full time (Probably the biggest mistake: raising money to pay ourselves to work on an un-tested idea full time!)
  13. Added content slowly and spent money quickly (content)
  14. Slowly started making revenue, slowly added more content (content)
  15. Started taking features out and refining it (based on feedback) into what should have been our minimum viable product as the site grows (technology)

If you watch people pitch at the Launch conference or TechCrunch Disrupt, one of the biggest things you’ll hear VCs and other judges ask many of them about is “distribution”… or if you build this idea, how will people find out about it? How will your application break into their workflow?

Think about building up an engaged audience (users) FIRST. DeviceKnit could have started as a simple blog that featured the kind of content we wanted people to eventually submit on the site, even if we just reblogged other content from around the Internet. The technology part would already be built (WordPress or any CMS), and then we could start building content ourselves and conversing with people about it (potential users). What is the blog-only equivalent of your idea?

My recommendation: Start with the users and content. Find communities and content that are out there now. What are all the potential substitutions for the content or technology your planning on providing? Talk openly with everyone in the communities about the application (the technology or product) you’re thinking of building. Ask what would make their lives easier. What they would pay for?

Gauge how excited these people are about any ideas you propose and LISTEN, instead of shaping their feedback to fit your idea and the features YOU think it should have. Re-read that last sentence. You will probably hear things that don’t fit perfectly with your grand idea, but remember, that’s why you’re talking to people now and haven’t built anything yet!

Then, start small with whatever content or software your audience thinks will provide the most value. Don’t write a business plan. Don’t try to raise money. Don’t try to get into an incubator/accelerator program, and don’t spend days designing your logo. Start building and keep it simple. Learn Rails and deploy on a cloud service like Duostack or Heroku. It is FREE up to this point, except for the time you’ve invested. You can’t code? Give this a shot: http://innonate.com/hope/ (I only recommend Rails here because it’s easy to deploy. If you want to go with PHP that’s fine, too.)

Build something, but don’t get too attached. Remember to think about people and quality content, not just technology. For lots of ideas, it’s easy to whip up the technology/product aspect in a week or even a few days. Just look at the products that come out of hackathons! You’re idea is mostly worthless until you start getting it into people’s hands and hearing what they think of it. Then, you can iterate and shape it to best fit their needs.

In my opinion, only now is DeviceKnit reaching the MVP (Minimum Viable Product) stage. I rebuilt it from scratch a few weeks ago to be only focused on content, leaving out many things from the original version that we thought were absolutely necessary when we launched it, and as it gets simpler it gets better: people are less confused, traffic is going up, and it is making more revenue.

You don’t have to take my advice, I just want to help people avoid the same mistakes I made. Do you have feedback for me on this article or DeviceKnit? Hit me up on twitter and let me know your thoughts, I’m @gohnjanotis.

I wrote this guest post on Venturebent after getting to know some of the writers while living in NYC for the summer to get a new project, Broodr, off the ground. I was amazed how strong the startup community was here, the quality of tech talent, and how many great new people I met through random startup events. If you’re looking for a change of scenery and interested in getting a company started, New York is definitely a place you should consider.

The Next Big Thing: Checking-In (Again)

I used to think there were three types of people in this world:

  1. Avid Foursquare users – those that check-in to foursquare religiously and have several mayorships, always vying for the top spot on their leaderboards;
  2. Casual Foursquare users – the check-in once in a while crowd, usually only at certain events, through other social apps that give you the option or when reminded by someone in group #1 ; and
  3. Foursquare non-users - those that have have either never heard of foursquare or think they are too cool to broadcast to the world where they are in exchange for points and digital badges.

With all of the hoopla around foursquare and its partnerships with deal sites over the last couple weeks, there’s no question check-in behavior is going to shift.. but how much?  I think the change could be significant, and here’s why.

The first thing you should know is that I very rarely use foursquare – you can throw me right in with the rest of group #2.  You might see a slew of check-ins from me once every couple of weeks at an event through @hashable, or bragging about being at the airport on my way to South Beach, but that’s really about it. 

Well something odd happened to me the other day: I found myself checking-in 2 times in one day (*GASP!*), unsolicited mind you, and using the actual foursquare app on my iPhone.  I couldn’t help but notice because there was a lot of extra effort involved in having to find the big blue checkbox icon buried deep in my app graveyard, somewhere amongst my collection of old beta tests and other seldom-used social apps (it was next to Color).  Something had tipped the scales in favor of making that effort. Actually, the scales never even existed before in the first place.  I’m just one guy and I could be wrong, but if they tipped for me, I think they just might start to tip for others as well.  

How it all changed: about two weeks ago,  I stopped by @WeWorkLabs Soho to say hello to @ScottBrit and @srcasm and see how Sfter and guyhaus were coming along (very well, if you’re wondering).  That’s when I was first introduced to Jason Fertel.  Jason (@fertel) is the founder of Freespeech, a group messaging app, but I didn’t know it at the time because he was enthusiastically explaining his new project - DealBurner (check out the story on BetaBeat here).  When I asked him what DealBurner was all about, he asked me first if I use foursquare (not a good start), and then Facebook Places (seriously?).

Just as I was about to write the whole thing off, he said something to the effect of, “you’re going to want to start”.  Ok, he had my attention… and I’m all the better for it.  If I could muster up the effort to check-in, DealBurner would send me notifications about deals going on near me, right then and there.  Google Now, LivingSocial Instant, ScoutMob, Tenka.. the list goes on.

A minute later I was signed-up, checked-in and, after a short pause (to let me bask in overtaking second-to-last place on my leaderboard, I was texted my first deal… And I was hooked.

Note: Foursquare has deals with Living Social, Gilt City, zozi, BuyWithMe, AT&T, and Groupon, but the Redemption Loop Issue still exists for all of them except for Groupon Now. In other words, you can get all of the regular deals through foursquare, but other than for Groupon Now, deals are not redeemable until after they close at the end of the day – which really makes this whole real-time, location-based thing foursquare does kind of irrelevant, no? Don’t get me wrong, foursquare is still a great distribution platform for daily deal sites, but when it comes to instant deals I would make sure I have DealBurner to get all of them sent straight to me after checking in.

So right after I get to experience DealBurner in action, something else really interesting happened.  Apparently my check-in had also sparked an alert from another promising NYC startup - Sonar had just notified me that I might want to reach out to someone else checked-in at WeWork because we have a mutual friend on facebook – someone named Jason F.

Touché foursquare, touché…  So now, I think there’s four types of people in this world and you can add me to a new group somewhere in between my original #1 and #2.  You still won’t see me feverishly competing for mayorships or the top spot on any of the leaderboards. Nonetheless, there’s definitely enough cool stuff now built on top of the foursquare API to bring me real value – and that means more check-ins… and a new spot for the app on my iPhone home screen.

Actually I should say, bravo foursquare.  It’s amazing that they’ve been able to capture such a large user base with so little in tangible incentives.  Now that foursquare and the applications that are leveraging their platform are finding ways to deliver real value in the form of financial savings and  serendipitous connections, it puts them in position to make some significant leaps. It also means they might be coming to a crossroads.

At the end of the day, for foursquare to truly obtain massive adoption, they need to ensure these types of “real world” value propositions become heavily coupled with the use of their application.   The big question is going to be: do they expand into these adjacent markets  and start providing these services in-house so they can extract more value?  Or, do they stay the course and continue building the platform to enable more of these services at the expense of diluting that value for something more down the road?  Or maybe they can walk the fine line somewhere in between?  I don’t know what the right answer is, and it’s probably a whole series of posts for another time, but it will definitely be interesting to see how this all plays out.

NYC Tech’s New Home

Welcome to Venturebent! Whether you realize it or not, you have stumbled upon a bastion of NYC tech, startups, and VC started by Nick GavronskyAlex Topiler, Scott Britton and I (Adam Besvinick). This concept was envisioned by four friends working at various financial institutions and early-stage companies, whose real passions lie in the world of startups, both as aspiring entrepreneurs and investors. Previously, on my personal blog I wrote about how Bill Simmons had teamed up with a number of top writers and thinkers to create Grantland, an online hub for sports and pop culture. Today, I’m proud to announce a partnership that the four of us have formed. While we each have a blog of our own that we’ll maintain separately, we’ve decided to join forces to showcase our very best content along with links to other resources, guest posts from respected names in the industry, and coverage of up-and-coming NYC startups. Additionally, you can also follow @Venturebent on Twitter for updates to the site as well as general observations by us writers. Our goal is for Venturebent to be the definitive hub for NYC tech, and we are hoping that it will be a must-visit site for those interested in startups, tech, and VC. We will likely have an East Coast and NYC bias for obvious reasons, but we hope to encourage a friendly rivalry with our counterparts in the Valley, as we accumulate more and more content (and traffic!). So, on that note, I highly encourage you to check out our debut posts on what we expect to become the go-to site for NYC tech talk.

Foursquare’s Big Round: A Sign of Things to Come for NYC

A little over a month ago, I wrote about how NYC was poised to make a run at Silicon Valley and how ultimately, the Big Apple would win out. Last Friday, Foursquare pulled a Neil Armstrong – one small step for them, one giant leap for NYC startups. After raising $50 million at a whopping $600 million valuation, they came that much closer to becoming the first $1 billion social media startup in NYC. And once we get one, I think the momentum will increase exponentially. Later that day, Bryce Roberts perfectly encapsulated the feeling I previously wrote about when he tweeted: “cool that NYC founders see the @foursquare funding as a win for the whole city. THAT is why NYC is such a special place for startups.” I described the physical and emotional closeness of the startups in NYC, the ease of communication, the confluence of creative industries. But I forgot one key point – we hate to lose and love to win.
New Yorkers are some of the most competitive people on Earth (and I’m proud to say I’m one of them in that regard), but when it comes to the startup community, we want NYC to win. (Quick side note: This also goes back to the notion of lessening the importance of individual accomplishments, which is why Millennials are the next great generation). Every entrepreneur will poor his/her blood, sweat, and tears into their startup to make sure it succeeds because at the end of the day, it’s for the betterment of the City’s place in the startup world. Foursquare eventually reaching a $1 billion valuation or Tumblr raising another ridiculous round is a proof of concept for the NYC startup. Not only can you come and build a great company here, but it can be a massive, game-changing one, which gives tremendous hope and confidence for all entrepreneurs in the City from the ones bootstrapping in the outer boroughs to the ones pitching at TechStars Demo Day at Webster Hall. Last Friday was an historic day in the NYC startup world, and we at Venturebent are proud to be part of an ecosystem that lauds this accomplishment but knows it’s just a sign that we’re moving towards bigger and better things.