Tag Archives: Startups

9 Lessons You Need to Succeed in a Crowded Market

Stand Up to the Elephant | Sparkology

When I first pitched the idea for Sparkology as an exclusive dating service, the biggest objection was also the most obvious: are you really going to create another dating site?  After all, there are thousands of dating service companies operating in the US and a handful of conglomerates have dominated the space for over a decade.  Match.com (owns OKCupid), Spark Networks (owns JDate and other properties), eHarmony, PlentyOfFish, Zoosk, True.com… all major companies with big marketing spend and millions of claimed users.  How did I expect to stack up and create a profitable business?

Six months later we have a solid team that’s generating real revenue on top of a successful platform.  Our client base is growing according to plan and, most importantly, those who use our service have become loyal brand evangelists.  Here are some of the strategies we have learned to use:

Choose the Right Niche

This is the only “no-brainer” of the pointers but I would be remiss if I excluded it.  You want to choose a niche demographic that the 800lb Gorillas won’t want to touch.  For us, it was selecting a demographic that is too small for a volume-based company to focus on.  We also selected a population that has high expectations for quality and customer service.  Lastly, we chose a demographic that is highly educated and is thus less effected by mass-media marketing approaches typically used by major brands.

However, you should also select a demographic that does not have a low ceiling for growth.  For example, one could create a dating website called jewishlithuanianswholovecats.com but that has a very real and very defined cap on the target demographic.  Instead, our mission of creating a quality-driven and efficient dating experience for young professional singles in large cities offers room for expansion of the potential market in step with the expansion of the company.  A company like IvyDate.com, for example, may experience brand dilution as it has run out of Ivy grads and is no longer true to its name.

Find Their Weakness

If you are innovating in a crowded market, you need to determine and exploit the key common weakness shared by your behemoth foes to make your marketing message efficient.  When Chipotle entered the crowded Tex-Mex food market, they exploited the common belief that a typical fast-food Tex-Mex establishment was grimy.  When we entered the dating market, we found that the majority of users in our demographic viewed dating sites as untrustworthy and only for runts who couldn’t get a date in real life.  If you can focus on the common weakness, you are able to cast a shadow on all of your competitors with one fell marketing line.

Take a Bold Stance

By being small, you have the ability to make bold, controversial statements.  If a few years ago the guys from 37Signals said “Salesforce sucks” only their fanboys would take note.  If Salesforce.com did the opposite, the negative public fallout would be a PR nightmare, not to mention all the positive publicity that statement would generate for 37Signals’ Highrise product.  Your goal as a small company is to develop a core group of Innovators and Early Adopters that are loyal to your dogma and help spread your gospel.  However, you need to provide your early clients with a powerful gospel to spread.  A guy won’t tell his friend that there’s a “new dating site” but he might tell his friends he’s on a site that lets him “stand out from the losers on OKC”.

Jujitsu

Assuming you are trying to shake up an industry, you can use the widespread negative sentiment against the current state of the industry by becoming the anti-status quo.  We’ve seen “voting for change” win over a national electorate base and it works the same way with customers.  Whether you are the anti-McDonalds, anti-800Flowers.com, or anti-Match.com you can use negative sentiment built by large brands over decades to your advantage.  You are changing the industry for the better, and you should motivate all those who believe in a better industry to take your side.

Geography

Unless you managed to get a Series C valuation on an Angel round, you simply do not have the capital and manpower to compete on a national or even regional scale.  Pick the smallest geography that will get you to profitability in light of your fixed costs and become master of that domain.  You will not be able to compete against the marketing machine of a large competitor in all markets, but perhaps your marketing power can match the large competitor in a small geography.  After you succeed in one place, you can easily ride the enthusiasm and positive press into other areas.

* The obvious risk is that a competitor launches your exact same product/service in parallel in another area.  Your goal should be to reach cash flow positive in the first geography in half the time it took you to develop the company from start to launch.

 

Get Personal

Embrace the fact that you are a small passionate team.  It’s much easier for customers to support the efforts of 5 struggling entrepreneurs than 500 corporate cogs.  Make yourself accessible to customers and share your personal story.  What made you start this company?  What keeps you going?  What do you struggle with?  Post pictures of your team doing something silly.  Send personal gifts to clients.  Get your hands dirty in the customer service inbox.  Every person on your small team may be a C-level executive… but the customer will still relish a personal response signed by the CEO rather than the intern you hired last week

As a startup, you should be maximizing the personal connection with customers.  While live events don’t always have high ROIs in terms of customer acquisition, the rapport you can build with attendees is immeasurable.  I can write all over our website that I believe in the modern gentleman and lady… but that belief becomes much more authentic when members see the passion with which I embrace that mantra.  Perhaps you can host intimate dinner parties for select customers?  Perhaps you can create an invite-only Facebook group for the key influencers?  You need to use the low barriers between you and your customers to your advantage.

The Big Guys Are Smart – Learn from Them

Chances are, the incumbent players in your space have been around for a while.  They have optimized their platforms for user acquisition, user experience, and user retention.  This is not the time to put your head in the sand.  Why not take a lesson from the pros?  Become a customer of every competitor. Learn what they do and why they do it.  I’m not saying you should replicate an entire business model, but at the very least you should understand their rationale for doing X before you do Y.  We hypothesize that OKCupid intentionally makes dating into a game to keep users clicking around their website so they can serve as many ads as possible.  When we designed a results-driven user experience, we needed to understand this would diminish the time a customer spends on our site so ad-based revenue would be irrelevant.

Competitive tracking also helps Search Engine Optimization.  There are a myriad of tools that will expose how a competitor obtains a certain page rank and where they source their backlinks.  With this information, you can at the very least employ a strategy to match their SEO status if not beat it.

Ninja Speed

Perhaps the most important element you possess is the speed with which you can adapt your service.  How long do you think it takes for your 800lb Gorilla to roll out a new feature?  Even after spending months gathering customer data, defining project objectives, assembling a dedicated team, and all the other corporate muck, they would need to test it exhaustively to make sure it doesn’t interfere with any of the other thousands of features that were added over the last decade; they would need to ensure compatibility across all their platforms, some of which are likely leftover from past acquisitions; they would need to test the update to ensure it propagates properly across dozens of servers; etc. etc. etc.

How about you?

My hope is that you can go from a customer suggestion to a team decision to test environment in 48 hours and get it into the customer’s hands within 3 days.  You get instant feedback on the feature’s performance and the customers see continual evolution of the product as well as a barrage of positive product updates to keep enthusiasm high.  Make sure to notify the customer who suggested the change after the feature has been implemented. What better way to create loyal customers than letting them take ownership of the product itself?

Divide into two teams of developers.  A core, focused team that works on major releases and a smaller scrum team that handles the hellish firedrills.

The Bigger They Are…

Entering a crowded market is a daunting task.  However, you are also entering a market where the customer is already “trained” to purchase a product or service type so the risk of building primary demand is gone.  By using your small size to your advantage, you can utilize the negativity associated with large competitors to create a core group of devout customers who recognize your value proposition, promote your product, and drive you toward positive cash flow so you can successfully take on the 800lb Gorillas.

Now get out there and disrupt a market!

New Problems

When I first started playing guitar all I wanted to do was learn barre chords. That’s it. After that I’d be able to play all of the Blink songs I wanted and then just relax or move on to something else (quite frankly I didn’t think there was music beyond Enema of the State).

But as it turns out, once I learned barre chords I wanted more. I wanted to actually sound like the recordings and not some haggard resemblance. And then, thankfully, I got into other music and wanted to solo like Duane Allman and Eddie Hazel, and then I wanted to write songs like Brad Nowell and play jazz like Wes Montgomery.

And now I have new problems, like channeling whatever talents I have into a consistent deliverable so I can play in public with or without a band.

The point is that I was never finished, I’m still not finished, and never will be finished. The finish line kept getting pushed back further and further until it disappeared altogether and then I realized, perhaps later than most, that there is no finish line.

So if you’re never finished with something how in the hell do you measure progress?

For certain endeavors there are metrics you can and should use and sometimes you can just tell.

But a helpful, basic way to measure progress – good, life progress – is by paying attention to the frequency with which you’re facing new problems.

For guitar that means getting past skill issues like developing hand strength, proper picking technique (by far the most important), and an effective vibrato and bend. Then you need to study music theory, practice scales and improvisation, learn about equipment, sound, and setup, play while singing and on and on and on.  The problems – or maybe “challenges” is a better way to think about them – never end.

If that sounds like an existential nightmare then I suggest you get over it. Because that’s life – it’d be easy and boring and not worth your time if it was any different

In terms of startups you can think of it this way:

  • Just linked up with a brilliant co-founder? Great. New problem.
  • Comfortable that you have a market? Awesome, now here’s a new problem.
  • Finished your product and ready to launch? Wonderful, now get a shit-ton of users and iterate like crazy (new problem!).
  • Raised a $1.2 million in series A? Congratulations! What’s your prize you ask? (Bob Barker voice): Whhhy it’s a BRAND NEW PROBLEM!

The other day I was reading up on the biographies of guys like Jim Breyer and Mike Moritz and Yuri Milner – basically masters-of-the-universe level dudes – and it struck me: as disgustingly accomplished as these guys are they still have real problems that they face day in and day out.

What’s the best use of their immense wealth and influence? How do they keep motivated and driven and grounded in the face of massive success? How do they carve out meaningful personal lives when everyone is trying to suckle at the teet of power?

Marlo Stanfield from The Wire would call these “good problems” and I wholeheartedly agree. But they’re problems nonetheless.

Or think about Adam Sandler’s character in Funny People. Same kind’ve of thing.

My point is that new problems are generally a good thing – they mean you’re growing and stretching and improving. You’re taking risks and rising to challenges.

Consider, on the other hand, old problems. If your job, after several years, is still an issue (in the sense that you hate it) then you need to do something about it. Same goes for relationships and personal shortcomings.  Old, enduring problems – in my experience at least – are surefire indicators of an atrophy in your abilities and character. And they’re constraining your potential.

So go out there a get some new goddamn problems.  They’ll be better than your old ones.

The Startup World’s Balance of Power

A couple days ago, Phineas Barnes wrote about how he plans to fix the VC product for entrepreneurs by allowing them to review him after every meeting with the hope that over time he will improve his preparation for meetings and punctuality, among other things. I think Phin’s goal is very admirable and one which I hope all VCs will strive to achieve, particularly during this current tech wave we are riding. Moreover, upon finishing the article, I realized that it is somewhat in line with a theory I have been kicking around for a little while.

The theory: The balance of power between entrepreneurs and VCs is cyclical and constantly shifting back and forth. Right now, when money is easier to come by, entrepreneurs have the leverage. VCs are competing for the hottest deals, and when it comes time for an entrepreneur to pick his/her investors (because the entrepreneur has that luxury during times like this), he/she will choose based on factors such as terms, geography, resources, experience, likeability, etc. For example, firms feel like they absolutely have to have certain types of senior associates and partners because they want the entrepreneurs to feel comfortable and select them. Phin says “investors are service providers.” However, I would argue that it is only now during this frothy period that VC has swung to more of a service business with entrepreneurs as the clients. When money is tighter, such as in 2001-2002, VCs had the leverage. Now, this “power” wasn’t an excuse to be unprepared for or late to meetings, but they just had more influence in the relationship. It was much less of a service business during that time and truly what one thinks of when the term “buy-side” is said.

So what does all this mean for entrepreneurs and VCs alike? As many have pointed out, entrepreneurs should be raising as much as they can during these good times because you never know when the shit will hit the fan, while also respecting that VCs are ones deploying that capital. And for VCs, regardless of whether they have leverage or not, they should understand that they only see a return if an entrepreneur accepts and does something lucrative with their investment. At the end of the day, it seems to me that if entrepreneurs and VCs could peacefully coexist (and realize it’s very difficult for one to thrive without the other), they could put an end to this cyclical tipping of the power scales and work together on equal footing.

 

Foursquare’s Big Round: A Sign of Things to Come for NYC

A little over a month ago, I wrote about how NYC was poised to make a run at Silicon Valley and how ultimately, the Big Apple would win out. Last Friday, Foursquare pulled a Neil Armstrong – one small step for them, one giant leap for NYC startups. After raising $50 million at a whopping $600 million valuation, they came that much closer to becoming the first $1 billion social media startup in NYC. And once we get one, I think the momentum will increase exponentially. Later that day, Bryce Roberts perfectly encapsulated the feeling I previously wrote about when he tweeted: “cool that NYC founders see the @foursquare funding as a win for the whole city. THAT is why NYC is such a special place for startups.” I described the physical and emotional closeness of the startups in NYC, the ease of communication, the confluence of creative industries. But I forgot one key point – we hate to lose and love to win.
New Yorkers are some of the most competitive people on Earth (and I’m proud to say I’m one of them in that regard), but when it comes to the startup community, we want NYC to win. (Quick side note: This also goes back to the notion of lessening the importance of individual accomplishments, which is why Millennials are the next great generation). Every entrepreneur will poor his/her blood, sweat, and tears into their startup to make sure it succeeds because at the end of the day, it’s for the betterment of the City’s place in the startup world. Foursquare eventually reaching a $1 billion valuation or Tumblr raising another ridiculous round is a proof of concept for the NYC startup. Not only can you come and build a great company here, but it can be a massive, game-changing one, which gives tremendous hope and confidence for all entrepreneurs in the City from the ones bootstrapping in the outer boroughs to the ones pitching at TechStars Demo Day at Webster Hall. Last Friday was an historic day in the NYC startup world, and we at Venturebent are proud to be part of an ecosystem that lauds this accomplishment but knows it’s just a sign that we’re moving towards bigger and better things.

The TechCrunch Machine

Last week, the frequently polarizing Michael Arrington wrote a post about how TechCrunch often “blindsides companies” by writing breaking news about them without reaching out to the entrepreneur or company itself first. Of course, at the center of attention this time, is Caterina Fake and her most recent startup. Despite Arrington’s reaching out to her to ask about a round of financing she supposedly raised, Fake decided to break the news herself on her own blog. While Arrington has done a lot of great things for startups, it’s nice to finally hear of someone “standing up to him” (even if that wasn’t Fake’s intention).

When TechCrunch first launched, not only was it a fantastic resource for readers but also entrepreneurs. Readers, particularly outsiders to the startup world, could gain “insider access” and learn about the happenings in the Valley. Entrepreneurs were able to get exposure for their startup. However, over time, the mission of TechCrunch has been lost, in my opinion.

Yes, it still is a fairly good resource for people to learn about tech and startups (but there are numerous other blogs which do this comparably well). However, I feel as though the site has become “too commercial.” There’s a reason the “What’s Hot” bar at the top of the page includes: Android, Apple, Facebook, Google, Groupon, Microsoft, Twitter, Zynga. The little entrepreneur has been pushed aside for the most part. An appearance on TechCrunch has become more about marketing than anything else, and the up-and-coming startup has become an afterthought. However, startups are very much afraid to “bite the hand that feeds them” because they don’t want to become the next Fake in the eyes of Arrington.

The other main flaw with TechCrunch is more a symptom of our society now than anything else. However, it featured prominently in Arrington’s most recent post, so I feel it’s worth addressing. That is, the idea of “breaking news.” In our 24/7 news cycle Twitter world, everyone becomes a journalist who can scoop any story. Not only is TechCrunch competing against every other tech blog and the entrepreneurs themselves, but they’re also competing against you and me. If we at Venturebent hear of an amazing new startup in NYC or a crazy development at a startup here, we could potentially break the news before Arrington. And frankly, that scares the shit out of him because his competitive advantage has long been that he has the most connections. Granted our audience is microscopic compared to TechCrunch’s (for now), but losing out on a scoop damages one’s credibility, especially if that’s what you hang your hat on. Consequently, Arrington’s trigger finger has become quicker and quicker over time to the point that he’s almost adopted the phrase, “ready, fire, aim.”

Despite all the TechCrunch / Arrington bashing, I still continue to follow both on Twitter and check the site on a daily basis. I just wish they’d go back to their roots, rather than continuing to evolve into this TechCrunch Machine with Arrington at the helm.